Home > babies with glasses, glasses, kids with glasses, medical stuff, toddlers with glasses > understanding your child’s glasses prescription

understanding your child’s glasses prescription

Edited on 26-Jan-10 to correct the errors that Dr. Bonilla-Warford pointed out (thanks Nate!) – Ann Z

Glasses prescriptions can be confusing – lots of numbers and abbreviations that aren’t necessarily easy to figure out, or at least, they weren’t when I first tried to understand Zoe’s prescription.  And in fact, I thought I understood what all the numbers meant, but after doing more research for this post, I found it to be far more complex than I’d originally thought. (On that note, if any eye doctor types read this and catch any mistakes, please, please let me know and I’ll correct them – thanks Nate!).

Before we get too far into what a prescription is, I thought it might be worthwhile to mention what a prescription isn’t.   It will not tell you:

  • what your child’s diagnosis is.  You can tell whether glasses will correct for nearsightedness or farsightedness, but that doesn’t tell you what the cause of the vision problem is.
  • if your child has amblyopia, it will not tell you what his or her actual visual acuity is.
  • if your child has strabismus, it will not tell you how much his or her eyes are turning in or out.
  • how well your child’s eyes work together, and whether or not he or she has stereoscopic vision.
  • how advanced your child’s cataracts or glaucoma is, and how that affects their vision.
  • anything that is not related to how glasses or contacts should be made in order to correct your child’s refractive errors (that is, due to the shape of the eye not being able to focus light correctly).

Okay, so back to the eyeglasses prescription then, and what it can tell you.  Prescriptions have a lot of different components, and I’ve seen them written a number of different ways, but they do have common elements at the core.  I’ll go into more detail on each piece, but I tried to put together something of a “cheat sheet” here:

explanation of an eyeglasses prescription

Which eye are we talking about?

Since we’re nearly always looking at prescriptions for two eyes, you’ll nearly always see two sets of numbers, one for the left eye, and one for the right.  I’ve seen some prescriptions that label them “left” and “right” or “l” and “r”, which even I can figure out on my own.  But more often, I’ve seen “O.D.” and “O.S.”.  These are abbreviations for the Latin words for left eye and right eye.  For the record:

  • O.D. : right eye
  • O.S. : left eye
  • O.U. (which I’ve never seen before, but found this information so figured I’d include it) : both eyes

Sphere

Sphere, often abbreviated as “sph” is the spherical refractive error, or nearsightedness or farsightedness.  It’s pretty much what I think of when I think of an eye glasses prescription.  Then again, I’ve never really had to deal with astigmatism (for me or Zoe).  The first part of this number will be a plus or minus sign:

  • + : farsighted, or longsighted prescription: hyperopia.
  • - : nearsighted, or shortsighted prescription: myopia.
  • 0, Pl, or Plano : no error

How bad is the spherical prescription?

The number is in “diopters” but we don’t need to know too much about that (read about it on Wikipedia here), it’s a measure of how much the curvature of the eye  is off from normal.  Basically, the higher the number (ignoring the plus or minus), the worse the prescription.

Myopia (-)

  • 0.00 to -3.00 : mild myopia
  • -3.00 to -6.00 : moderate myopia
  • -6.00 and higher : high myopia

Hyperopia (+)

  • 0.00 to +2.25 : mild hyperopia
  • +2.25 to +5.00 : moderate hyperopia
  • +5.00 and higher : high hyperopia

Cylinder

Cylinder is the measure of astigmatism.  Astigmatism is when there’s an irregular shape to the cornea, often described as a football shape.  It causes blurriness at any distance.  There are two measurements that go along with astigmatism, the first, cylinder, is a measure of how severe the astigmatism is.

How bad is the cylinder prescription?

Like the spherical error, the cylinder number is measured in diopters.  The thing you want to pay attention to is the number.  It may be written as a plus or a minus, but that doesn’t actually make any difference in how bad the prescription is, ophthalmologists use a “+”, optometrists use a “-” (see Dr. Bonilla-Warford’s comment for more explanation of that).   The higher the number after the plus or minus, the more severe the astigmatism.

  • 0.00 to 1.00 : mild astigmatism
  • 1.00 to 2.00 : moderate astigmatism
  • 2.00 to 3.00 : severe astigmatism
  • 3.00 and higher : extreme astigmatism

Axis

The axis tells you whish way the astigmatism is oriented on your child's eye

If you think of astigmatism as a football shape, it makes sense that the football might be turned any direction.  The axis number then, tells you the orientation of the astigmatism.  The number is in degrees, it doesn’t have anything to do with how severe the astigmatism is, just how it is situated on your child’s eye.

Add

If your child needs bifocals, you will likely see a number here.  This tells you how the prescription should be changed for close up.  Let’s say your child has a regular glasses prescription of +3.00, if the add number is +1.00, then the near distance prescription will be +3.00 + 1.00, which equals +4.00 (3+1=4).  In the same vein, if your child is nearsighted, say -4.00, but has an add of +2.00, then the  near distance part of the bifocals will have a prescription of -4.00 + 2.00, which equals -2.00.

Sometimes, you don’t have an “Add” part of the prescription, and instead you’ll just see a prescriptions for distance vision and a separate prescription for near vision.

But what does that mean for how my child sees?

If you’re wondering what your child’s prescription means in terms of how they can see, there are a couple of places online where you can plug them in to see how blurry things appear.  Keep in mind that an eyeglasses prescription is not the final word in how well a child sees.  For instance, it will not tell you how your child’s weak eye is seeing if your child has amblyopia, or how your child might be seeing if he or she has cataracts or glaucoma.

Online vision simulators:

  • Eyeland Web Tools – this site has one tool for myopia, and a different one for hyperopia, and one for astigmatism.  All three show you a scene that you might see while driving a car.  So hopefully not a scene that your child would necessarily see, but it still helped me visualize how the world might look with Zoe’s prescription.  Simulates prescriptions from +9 to -9 for the spherical error, and up to -8 for the astigmatism.
  • Eli Billauer’s blur simulator – I’ve mentioned this site before on Little Four Eyes.  Enter your child’s prescription (sphere, cylinder and axis) for each eye, and it will show you two Snellen charts (the one’s with the big E at the top), one for each eye, that simulates how your child might see it.  Simulates prescriptions from +5 to -5 for the spherical error and +5 to -5 for astigmatism.
  • Wolfram Alpha – this is a weird search engine that tries to answer your questions, and calculate equations that you enter.  You can enter your child’s eyeglasses prescription, and it will give you information about it, including a simulation of looking at the Snellen chart, and the far or near point for clear vision.  You will only see the Snellen chart if the simulator thinks one of the lines would be visible, which is +2.5 to -2.5.   You need to enter the prescription this way:
    OD +4.25 cyl 0.5 x 90

    (the number after the “x” is the axis for astigmatism, you can leave off the astigmatism numbers if they don’t apply).


  1. January 25, 2010 at 12:06 pm | #1

    This is marvelous, Ann. A really great reference for parents.

    A few notes:

    OD = right eye (Latin – Oculus Dexter)
    OS = left eye (Oculus Sinister)
    OU = both eyes Oculus Uterque)
    I see that you have this, but it is incorrect on the Ex diagram. Also out of convention the OD is always listed first/on top.

    One of the most confusing things to patients is that for cylinder (cyl), plus or minus is NOT an indication of the visual problem that the patient has, but is purely convention. MDs use plus and ODs use minus. This in itself would not be a big deal, except that it changes the other numbers, and it patients can think there is a change when there really isn’t.

    Example: First eval (MD) +4.50 +2.00 X 090. Second eval (OD)+ 6.50 -2.00 X 180

    Parent: Oh! Her eyes have gotten so much worse!
    OD: No, don’t worry is exactly the same. Here, let me show you. This is how you convert between MD and OD glasses prescriptions.

    1. Add the cylinder power to the sphere power
    2. Change the sign of the cyl (if +, then use -, if – use plus)
    3. Add 90 degrees to the axis is less than 90 or subtract 90 if the original axis is greater than 90.

    This even trips up opticians, and is one of those little quirks of convention.

    I hope this is helpful.

    • January 25, 2010 at 2:57 pm | #2

      Thanks Nate! I caught the left vs right in my text last night, but forgot to check to make sure the figure was right. Oops. I’ll have to fix that when I get home.

      I read an explanation of the astigmatism differences in how they’re written, but I didn’t understand it well enough to explain it myself, so thank you for the clarification on that, too.

      • January 26, 2010 at 3:11 am | #3

        If you are redoing the diagram anyway, here’s another little nit-picky thing: sphere and cyl always go to 2 decimal places and the axis is always in three digits. So it is “+4.00 +1.50 X 090″ not “+4.0 +1.5 X 90″

        Not trying to be a pest, but I figured that since this is a post on the spectacle Rx, it should be consistent.

  2. Ginny Z
    January 28, 2010 at 2:44 am | #4

    This is awesome – thanks. And thanks to Nathan for explaining the MD/OD prescription thing – I was wondering why my last prescription looked so different from the previous one (and the doc didn’t bother to explain, she just said that my new glasses were almost the same as my old ones).

  3. Christy
    January 28, 2010 at 1:47 pm | #5

    This is great Ann, thanks! I have a much better understanding of Emma’s prescription now….

  4. Tobi
    January 28, 2010 at 6:21 pm | #6

    So helpful! THANK YOU!!!

  5. ingrid
    February 1, 2010 at 11:51 am | #7

    Hi all,
    Speaking of scripts, I am very pleased to announce that we had our appointment with the PO for Paris today and her script has not changed it is nice and stable and her vision has improved from 3/18 to 3/12 in her amblyopic eye so it was very good news all round. We have to continue what we are doing, wearing the glases all the time and patching two hours and he does not need to see us for another six months. Needless to say we were so so happy that the work is paying off. Nate I also wanted to ask you about Paris’s script – she is right eye -4.5l/+1/90 and the left eye plano. Do you think with such a big difference contacts would be a better option? She is two. PO seemed to think when she is 8-10 years old but I have read some interesting reports on contacts being a better option even at this young age? Many thanks.

  6. ingrid
    February 1, 2010 at 11:52 am | #8

    sorry that should have read
    -4.5 – 1- 90 for her script

  7. GeorgeB
    February 3, 2010 at 12:11 am | #10

    I’ve often mused over what Nicholas does see. After reading through all of the information above, and running the simulation, I have to admit I’m equal parts intrigued, scared, and proud. This simulation ends at -6, however N’s rx is well past the scale(-7.5 OS, -18 OD). I’m left thinking..wow..if -6 is..well wow, then what does/ how does he see at the above numbers?? He does quite well in fact..both with and without the glasses..though extrapolating the scale of the simulation the reality must be..something north of wow. I’m left nothing short of amazed at what he..all our kids…are able to overcome. Incredible stuff.

  8. ingrid
    February 3, 2010 at 3:26 am | #11

    it sure is George, I thought the same. At -4.5 it was pretty bad on the simulation! Amazing is right, what children can overcome is inspiring.

  9. Melissa
    February 26, 2010 at 4:58 pm | #12

    My son was just recently diagnosed with astigmatism related bilateral amblyopia. I have been trying for two days to decifer the RX before our 1st appt with the opthalmologist. I can now put his script into context. His Cy is 3.25, so while maybe not as bad as it could be it still falls in the extreme range. Thanks a million!

  10. Robert
    March 29, 2010 at 7:13 am | #13

    I notice young kids with high magnifying glasses, and even bifocals. Is there a reason for this? Lots of hyperopic kids out there? I’m mildly nearsighted so I wonder what it’s like for farsighted people out there. Do you see clear far away or is far away even blurry rendering you helpless without your glasses? Why do some need bifocals and others not? Years ago, at my junior high school around 1987 there was a teen girl with strong magnifying bifocals in larger clear plastic frames who I didn’t know real well, just passed her in the hall and coming out of a class. Her glasses must have been +6 or above I’m guessing. Is farsightedness more of an inconvenience than nearsightedness in terms of how it affects your life? Like could hyperopes survive a day without glasses? What would you do if you broke them and needed to drive to the eye dr but couldn’t wear them thus couldn’t you see well to even drive if farsighted?

    • March 29, 2010 at 6:01 pm | #14

      Robert, yes, the majority of young children in glasses are hyperopic. Check out this simulation to see what that looks like: http://www.eyeland-design.com/webtools/53828496ca1045c06/53828496bd08b1006/index.html – as you get much beyond +3, you start losing detail even in the distance.

      One of the big problems with hyperopia, especially in young children is that it causes eyestrain and can pull their eyes out of alignment. My daughter can function relatively well without glasses, she’s a +3.5, but she gets tired quickly and her eyes cross. That’s a big deal when they’re still developing stereoscopic vision and when they’re trying to learn to read.

      As for what would someone with strong hyperopia do if they broke their glasses? Probably the same thing that someone with myopia does – wear a back up pair until they get them fixed.

  1. No trackbacks yet.