understanding your child’s glasses prescription
Edited on 26-Jan-10 to correct the errors that Dr. Bonilla-Warford pointed out (thanks Nate!) – Ann Z
Glasses prescriptions can be confusing – lots of numbers and abbreviations that aren’t necessarily easy to figure out, or at least, they weren’t when I first tried to understand Zoe’s prescription. And in fact, I thought I understood what all the numbers meant, but after doing more research for this post, I found it to be far more complex than I’d originally thought. (On that note, if any eye doctor types read this and catch any mistakes, please, please let me know and I’ll correct them – thanks Nate!).
Before we get too far into what a prescription is, I thought it might be worthwhile to mention what a prescription isn’t. It will not tell you:
- what your child’s diagnosis is. You can tell whether glasses will correct for nearsightedness or farsightedness, but that doesn’t tell you what the cause of the vision problem is.
- if your child has amblyopia, it will not tell you what his or her actual visual acuity is.
- if your child has strabismus, it will not tell you how much his or her eyes are turning in or out.
- how well your child’s eyes work together, and whether or not he or she has stereoscopic vision.
- how advanced your child’s cataracts or glaucoma is, and how that affects their vision.
- anything that is not related to how glasses or contacts should be made in order to correct your child’s refractive errors (that is, due to the shape of the eye not being able to focus light correctly).
Okay, so back to the eyeglasses prescription then, and what it can tell you. Prescriptions have a lot of different components, and I’ve seen them written a number of different ways, but they do have common elements at the core. I’ll go into more detail on each piece, but I tried to put together something of a “cheat sheet” here:

Which eye are we talking about?
Since we’re nearly always looking at prescriptions for two eyes, you’ll nearly always see two sets of numbers, one for the left eye, and one for the right. I’ve seen some prescriptions that label them “left” and “right” or “l” and “r”, which even I can figure out on my own. But more often, I’ve seen “O.D.” and “O.S.”. These are abbreviations for the Latin words for left eye and right eye. For the record:
- O.D. : right eye
- O.S. : left eye
- O.U. (which I’ve never seen before, but found this information so figured I’d include it) : both eyes
Sphere
Sphere, often abbreviated as “sph” is the spherical refractive error, or nearsightedness or farsightedness. It’s pretty much what I think of when I think of an eye glasses prescription. Then again, I’ve never really had to deal with astigmatism (for me or Zoe). The first part of this number will be a plus or minus sign:
- + : farsighted, or longsighted prescription: hyperopia.
- - : nearsighted, or shortsighted prescription: myopia.
- 0, Pl, or Plano : no error
How bad is the spherical prescription?
The number is in “diopters” but we don’t need to know too much about that (read about it on Wikipedia here), it’s a measure of how much the curvature of the eye is off from normal. Basically, the higher the number (ignoring the plus or minus), the worse the prescription.
Myopia (-)
- 0.00 to -3.00 : mild myopia
- -3.00 to -6.00 : moderate myopia
- -6.00 and higher : high myopia
Hyperopia (+)
- 0.00 to +2.25 : mild hyperopia
- +2.25 to +5.00 : moderate hyperopia
- +5.00 and higher : high hyperopia
Cylinder
Cylinder is the measure of astigmatism. Astigmatism is when there’s an irregular shape to the cornea, often described as a football shape. It causes blurriness at any distance. There are two measurements that go along with astigmatism, the first, cylinder, is a measure of how severe the astigmatism is.
How bad is the cylinder prescription?
Like the spherical error, the cylinder number is measured in diopters. The thing you want to pay attention to is the number. It may be written as a plus or a minus, but that doesn’t actually make any difference in how bad the prescription is, ophthalmologists use a “+”, optometrists use a “-” (see Dr. Bonilla-Warford’s comment for more explanation of that). The higher the number after the plus or minus, the more severe the astigmatism.
- 0.00 to 1.00 : mild astigmatism
- 1.00 to 2.00 : moderate astigmatism
- 2.00 to 3.00 : severe astigmatism
- 3.00 and higher : extreme astigmatism
Axis

The axis tells you whish way the astigmatism is oriented on your child's eye
If you think of astigmatism as a football shape, it makes sense that the football might be turned any direction. The axis number then, tells you the orientation of the astigmatism. The number is in degrees, it doesn’t have anything to do with how severe the astigmatism is, just how it is situated on your child’s eye.
Add
If your child needs bifocals, you will likely see a number here. This tells you how the prescription should be changed for close up. Let’s say your child has a regular glasses prescription of +3.00, if the add number is +1.00, then the near distance prescription will be +3.00 + 1.00, which equals +4.00 (3+1=4). In the same vein, if your child is nearsighted, say -4.00, but has an add of +2.00, then the near distance part of the bifocals will have a prescription of -4.00 + 2.00, which equals -2.00.
Sometimes, you don’t have an “Add” part of the prescription, and instead you’ll just see a prescriptions for distance vision and a separate prescription for near vision.
But what does that mean for how my child sees?
If you’re wondering what your child’s prescription means in terms of how they can see, there are a couple of places online where you can plug them in to see how blurry things appear. Keep in mind that an eyeglasses prescription is not the final word in how well a child sees. For instance, it will not tell you how your child’s weak eye is seeing if your child has amblyopia, or how your child might be seeing if he or she has cataracts or glaucoma.
Online vision simulators:
- Eyeland Web Tools – this site has one tool for myopia, and a different one for hyperopia, and one for astigmatism. All three show you a scene that you might see while driving a car. So hopefully not a scene that your child would necessarily see, but it still helped me visualize how the world might look with Zoe’s prescription. Simulates prescriptions from +9 to -9 for the spherical error, and up to -8 for the astigmatism.
- Eli Billauer’s blur simulator – I’ve mentioned this site before on Little Four Eyes. Enter your child’s prescription (sphere, cylinder and axis) for each eye, and it will show you two Snellen charts (the one’s with the big E at the top), one for each eye, that simulates how your child might see it. Simulates prescriptions from +5 to -5 for the spherical error and +5 to -5 for astigmatism.
- Wolfram Alpha – this is a weird search engine that tries to answer your questions, and calculate equations that you enter. You can enter your child’s eyeglasses prescription, and it will give you information about it, including a simulation of looking at the Snellen chart, and the far or near point for clear vision. You will only see the Snellen chart if the simulator thinks one of the lines would be visible, which is +2.5 to -2.5. You need to enter the prescription this way:
OD +4.25 cyl 0.5 x 90
(the number after the “x” is the axis for astigmatism, you can leave off the astigmatism numbers if they don’t apply).

This is marvelous, Ann. A really great reference for parents.
A few notes:
OD = right eye (Latin – Oculus Dexter)
OS = left eye (Oculus Sinister)
OU = both eyes Oculus Uterque)
I see that you have this, but it is incorrect on the Ex diagram. Also out of convention the OD is always listed first/on top.
One of the most confusing things to patients is that for cylinder (cyl), plus or minus is NOT an indication of the visual problem that the patient has, but is purely convention. MDs use plus and ODs use minus. This in itself would not be a big deal, except that it changes the other numbers, and it patients can think there is a change when there really isn’t.
Example: First eval (MD) +4.50 +2.00 X 090. Second eval (OD)+ 6.50 -2.00 X 180
Parent: Oh! Her eyes have gotten so much worse!
OD: No, don’t worry is exactly the same. Here, let me show you. This is how you convert between MD and OD glasses prescriptions.
1. Add the cylinder power to the sphere power
2. Change the sign of the cyl (if +, then use -, if – use plus)
3. Add 90 degrees to the axis is less than 90 or subtract 90 if the original axis is greater than 90.
This even trips up opticians, and is one of those little quirks of convention.
I hope this is helpful.
Thanks Nate! I caught the left vs right in my text last night, but forgot to check to make sure the figure was right. Oops. I’ll have to fix that when I get home.
I read an explanation of the astigmatism differences in how they’re written, but I didn’t understand it well enough to explain it myself, so thank you for the clarification on that, too.
If you are redoing the diagram anyway, here’s another little nit-picky thing: sphere and cyl always go to 2 decimal places and the axis is always in three digits. So it is “+4.00 +1.50 X 090″ not “+4.0 +1.5 X 90″
Not trying to be a pest, but I figured that since this is a post on the spectacle Rx, it should be consistent.
This is awesome – thanks. And thanks to Nathan for explaining the MD/OD prescription thing – I was wondering why my last prescription looked so different from the previous one (and the doc didn’t bother to explain, she just said that my new glasses were almost the same as my old ones).
This is great Ann, thanks! I have a much better understanding of Emma’s prescription now….
So helpful! THANK YOU!!!
Hi all,
Speaking of scripts, I am very pleased to announce that we had our appointment with the PO for Paris today and her script has not changed it is nice and stable and her vision has improved from 3/18 to 3/12 in her amblyopic eye so it was very good news all round. We have to continue what we are doing, wearing the glases all the time and patching two hours and he does not need to see us for another six months. Needless to say we were so so happy that the work is paying off. Nate I also wanted to ask you about Paris’s script – she is right eye -4.5l/+1/90 and the left eye plano. Do you think with such a big difference contacts would be a better option? She is two. PO seemed to think when she is 8-10 years old but I have read some interesting reports on contacts being a better option even at this young age? Many thanks.
sorry that should have read
-4.5 – 1- 90 for her script
Ingrid, have you seen Dr. Bonilla-Warford’s post on young children and contact http://www.brighteyesnews.com/2008/06/14/ask-dr-b-can-babies-really-use-contact-lenses/ ? It mentions that very different prescriptions in the two eyes can be a reason for contacts. There’s also a recent post showing how one family gets the contacts into their child’s eyes http://www.brighteyesnews.com/2010/01/26/toddlers-can-use-contacts-video/
I’ve often mused over what Nicholas does see. After reading through all of the information above, and running the simulation, I have to admit I’m equal parts intrigued, scared, and proud. This simulation ends at -6, however N’s rx is well past the scale(-7.5 OS, -18 OD). I’m left thinking..wow..if -6 is..well wow, then what does/ how does he see at the above numbers?? He does quite well in fact..both with and without the glasses..though extrapolating the scale of the simulation the reality must be..something north of wow. I’m left nothing short of amazed at what he..all our kids…are able to overcome. Incredible stuff.
it sure is George, I thought the same. At -4.5 it was pretty bad on the simulation! Amazing is right, what children can overcome is inspiring.
My son was just recently diagnosed with astigmatism related bilateral amblyopia. I have been trying for two days to decifer the RX before our 1st appt with the opthalmologist. I can now put his script into context. His Cy is 3.25, so while maybe not as bad as it could be it still falls in the extreme range. Thanks a million!
I notice young kids with high magnifying glasses, and even bifocals. Is there a reason for this? Lots of hyperopic kids out there? I’m mildly nearsighted so I wonder what it’s like for farsighted people out there. Do you see clear far away or is far away even blurry rendering you helpless without your glasses? Why do some need bifocals and others not? Years ago, at my junior high school around 1987 there was a teen girl with strong magnifying bifocals in larger clear plastic frames who I didn’t know real well, just passed her in the hall and coming out of a class. Her glasses must have been +6 or above I’m guessing. Is farsightedness more of an inconvenience than nearsightedness in terms of how it affects your life? Like could hyperopes survive a day without glasses? What would you do if you broke them and needed to drive to the eye dr but couldn’t wear them thus couldn’t you see well to even drive if farsighted?
Robert, yes, the majority of young children in glasses are hyperopic. Check out this simulation to see what that looks like: http://www.eyeland-design.com/webtools/53828496ca1045c06/53828496bd08b1006/index.html – as you get much beyond +3, you start losing detail even in the distance.
One of the big problems with hyperopia, especially in young children is that it causes eyestrain and can pull their eyes out of alignment. My daughter can function relatively well without glasses, she’s a +3.5, but she gets tired quickly and her eyes cross. That’s a big deal when they’re still developing stereoscopic vision and when they’re trying to learn to read.
As for what would someone with strong hyperopia do if they broke their glasses? Probably the same thing that someone with myopia does – wear a back up pair until they get them fixed.
hi i found your post very helpful but i was wondering, my son is 5 years old cy +10! i know…. strong!!! but we are working ourselves up to the right prescription! he is on +8.5 at the moment! 3rd pair! started at +5, will his eyesight ever get better? is there much chance of it deteriorating anymore? and what is the max a long sighted prescription goes to in strength?
I have a question about “PD” on the prescription which is pupillary distance ( I am sure everyone here knows that but just thought I’ll mention it anyways ). How important is the PD accuracy ? We had appointments with 2 Pediatric ophthalmologists regarding my son’s accomodative esotropia. One of then wrote the PD on the prescription while the other didnt and asked us to get it from the optician. When we went to get his glasses the optician insisted she would need to recheck the PD and not just go with what the doc had written down. Surprisingly it was way off – Docs PD was 55 and opticians PD was 51. She suggested we go with 52. I am concerned now. WHat are your thoughts ?
PD is an important measurement that effects the manufacturing of prescripiton eyeglasses. To understand the importantance you need to know a little more about how a prescription lens works.
Prescription Lenses are curved, not flat. The higher the prescription, the higher the curve. (Regardless of whether it’s + or -) The prescription that your Doctor writes for you is located in the center of the lens. (The “OC” or Optical Center) As you move away from the optical center, the prescription in the lens gets weaker. The amount of change as you move away from the optical center is greater the higher your prescription. Someone with a very weak prescription may not notice this change at all, while someone with a very high prescription will always notice it. (If you are wearing glasses, choose a word on your computer screen to focus on, and then move your head from side to side. You may notice a subtle change in clarity!)
To get the most accurate vision through your glasses, the optical center of your lens should always be directly in front of your eye. The PD measurement tells your glasses manufacturer where your eyes are so they can be sure to move the lenses optical center so that it lines up with your eyes.
In addition, Your eyes are very smart and want to see as clearly as possible. If the Optical center is not directly in front of your eyes, your eyes will actually turn towards it. This can be good or bad. If your eyes are currently straight, an offset OC can cause your eyes to turn and cause a lot of strain. If you have one or both eyes that turn in, or out, purposely offsetting the OC will incourage your eyes to turn towards the propper direction to help straighten them.
If your child has one or both eyes that turn, you may notice yet another piece to the prescription, called prism. It is usually indicated by a number (how much prism), followed by a triangle (the symbol for prism), and the word up, down, in, or out (or simply an arrow, indicating which direction the prism should go) If you see this on your child’s prescription, it means that you doctor wants their glasses to be made with the optical center moved, to help pull their eyes in the proper direction.
I guess I’m a little confused. My 6 and 8 year old were just diagnosed with moderate and severe farsightedness and astigmatism.
My 6 year old’s Rx is : O.D. +1.25, 1.25 cylinder (they are gradually going to increase the Rx so her eyes can adjust); O.S. is about the same
My 8 year old is worse and so far O.D. is + 2.5, cylinder -1.5 and O.S. +1.5, cylinder -0.75(again gradually increasing the Rx in probably 3 stages)
My confusion arises from the fact that neither had ever appeared to have any problems. They both learned to read well in kindergarten and have done well in school. If their eyes are supposedly so bad, how did they see to do their work?
The optometrist said that young kids’ eye muscles can adapt and let them see but causes a lot of strain. Is that possible?
Hi Amy! What your optometrist told you is exactly how I understand it. Farsightedness can be compensated for with the accommodative reflex. But it can lead to eyestrain and fatigue, and can even lead to the eyes crossing. Both of your children have mild to moderate farsightedness, and moderate astigmatism. As your kids get older, and the print they read gets smaller, they might have more problems focusing on their school work.
I hope that helps – If you’re still unsure, I’d recommend a second opinion.
Thanks so much for the information. This site is such a great resource!
Both my kids’ prescriptions that I listed are the ones they have now. Eventually, their prescriptions will be higher. The optometrist said my son falls into the severe category and my daughter is toward the tail end of the moderate category. That’s why it was hard for me to conceptualize that the muscles could accomodate enough for them to do as well as they have in school.
Ah, sorry, I understand now. I think a second opinion is warranted in your case. I’ll have to do some research to see just how much farsightedness can be compensated for by children. The astigmatism may also be relatively new – Zoe’s astigmatism jumped pretty significantly over a few months’ time.
I just wasn’t clear enough with my first post. Thanks for the info. My next question was actually going to be if I should get a second opinion. My pediatrician recommended a pediatric ophthalmologist and I guess I’ll take them there since it’s covered on my insurance. Sadly, we didn’t put them on our vision plan this year.
I was actually surprised they are farsighted. My husband’s eyes are perfect and my vision requires a -7 Rx so I figured my kids might be nearsighted but not farsighted.
Thanks again.
Thank you so much for this post. We just found out yesterday that our 4-year-old daughter has a pretty moderate astigmatism and will likely need glasses, but she’s going for a follow-up first before we get to that point. Our optometrist explained what she sees, but I have a much better idea now with the website links.
Thank you for this post, my 6 year old son has a strong prescription (OD+6.75 cylinder -125 axis 178 OS +8.25, cylinder -150, axis 172) and newly added ADD +2.75 so we are now looking at bifocals. For the last 4 years I have struggled trying to understand what it all means and how he may see.
Thank you!
Looking for an opinion: My son is far sighted, has strabismus, amblyopia and an astigmatism. He patches and he wears prescription eyewear to correct his vision. He is in kindergarten and would rather not wear glasses or patch, if he had a choice. Six months ago I went in to get a frame and lenses for him and when they filled the prescription, it was off +25 in the sphere and the lenses completely eliminated the astigatism portion of the prescription! On his follow up appointment today, to evaluate his eyes, they checked his prescription and realized it wasn’t correct. They are the one’s that filled it, however, and assured me that it wasn’t any big deal at all. In your view, is that pretty serious, to mess up a young child’s prescription? Would you find another opthamologist and view this as pretty negligent on their part? Or is it really common and not a big deal, as they tried to tell me?
His eyes are certainly not better so 6 months of wearing glasses consistently, completely wasted!
I would be pretty annoyed at that, especially not correcting the astigmatism portion. I do know that prescriptions can be off by a bit (that was the case with one of my daughter’s pairs), but I don’t know what the normal tolerance is for error like that. In any case, if you’re unhappy with them, then I would definitely find another place. I don’t think the six months were wasted, though. They did help correct his vision, and he was surely seeing better with his glasses than without them.
hi guys,i have question,my 6 yr old child has prescription his OD is -0.75 and OS -1.00,is it worst im just worried for him the doc didnt tell us anything so i dont have and idea..lol…U think wearing glasses will help him improve his eye sight?thanks
Hi Shei, those are mild nearsighted prescriptions. I like this simulator – http://www.eyeland-design.com/webtools/53828496ca1045c06/53828496bd08d7c0c/index.html – for seeing what it’s like to have that prescription. Wearing glasses will definitely correct his vision while the glasses are on, and that will help his vision develop correctly, but it won’t “cure” his nearsightedness, and he might need a stronger prescription as he gets older, that’s a totally normal thing in this case.
oh thank u very much for the info ann:)it make me lil worried that there is no cure…
I want to know what my child sees. Is there any site that can give parents an understanding of what the world looks like through little farsighted eyes which also have astigmatism?
Hey folks!! My nine year old is wearing glasses and her prescription just keeps getting so much worse!! its making me nervous. Should I be worried, what can I do? She started at like a -1.00 a few years back and now shes a -4.25. Bad vision runs in the family and I am a glasses wearer too, but my vision is not as bad as hers… Any ideas? Could their be something medical making it worse?
I asked an optometrist this once, and was told that they don’t really know what causes nearsightedness to get worse. There are some studies that have found a few treatments that seem to slow the progression: bifocals is one, orthokeratology (wearing rigid contacts at night to reshape the cornea) is another, though I haven’t done a lot of research on this. I do know that usually people’s prescription stabilizes in their early 20s (though mine continued to get worse until I was about 30). I would ask your daughter’s eye doctor, but my sense is that it’s not a medical issue that’s making her progression worse, just bad luck as it were.
I’d love to hear what your eye doctor says.
My son has just had a routine eye exam and is long-sighted. OD +1.75 and OS +2.75. They want him to wear glasses to help correct his vision and they seemed to suggest that after wearing glasses his eyesight would then improve and he might not need to wear them in the future. Is this likely? My son is 8 and very concerned about wearing glasses. If I can say it is temporary that would be great but I don’t want to give him false hope! Does anyone have experience or knowledge of this?
By the way he is an excellent reader and will read for long stretches, holding his book at a normal distance from his eyes without any problems so the far-sighted diagnosis was a surprise!
Hi Cathy, Kids do tend to outgrow at least some of their farsightedness as they get older. From my reading of the studies, children are more likely to not need glasses later on in life when the initial prescription is low, and they are first prescribed glasses at a later age. Both of which are true for your son, but gosh, if it were my, I think I wouldn’t tell him it’s temporary. I’ve gotten in trouble before promising things that I shouldn’t have promised. Has he picked out glasses yet? Do you think that he’ll feel better about the glasses if he has say in the style, especially if he finds glasses he likes?
Good luck!
This is really helpful, honestly after 4 years attending eye apts with my son, this is the easiest to understand. Thank you.
Thank you for this! So very helpful and makes me feel a little better to know that I am not the only one dealing with this. We just found out that our 18 months old needs glasses because he is very farsighted and his RIGHT EYE would go inward sometimes. His prescription is RIGHT +5.25 x -0.25 x 040 and LEFT +3.75 x -0.25 x 145. It just hurts my heart to think/know that my son is having vision problems. I made an appointment with another pediatric ophthalmologist for a second opinion just to get a confirmation.
Thank you so much. This was VERY helpful!
What percentage can I see if I have -OS 7.5 lenses ? My little one is 4 yrs old
I am a bit confused, the PO at the hospital said that my daughter is mildly myopic with a minor astigmatism, and mentioned something at her last appointment about wearing her glasses for homework, but she still wears her glasses all the time – does she need to? Her prescription is -1.00 sph with -.075 cyl on a 90 degree for both eyes. My current prescription is worse than this but I only wear my glasses to drive and watch TV. Her next appointment isn’t for 3 months so I’m a bit confused as to whether she should be wearing them continuously or not.